Improving wild animal welfare through contraception

Authored by Wild Animal Initiative’s Researcher Simon Eckerström Liedholm, Grants Manager & Researcher Luke Hecht, and Science Director Vittoria Elliott, this paper was published September 11, 2024, in BioScience.

Abstract

To date, research on the welfare impacts of wildlife contraceptives has mostly been focused on the potential harms of contraceptives. However, there are compelling theoretical reasons to expect direct and indirect welfare benefits of wildlife contraceptives. These positive welfare effects would be experienced by more than just the treated individuals, because per capita resource availability will increase with decreasing numbers of individuals sharing a resource. In the present article, we discuss the potential for wildlife contraceptives to alleviate resource competition and their associated negative welfare effects at different scales. These effects are expected to vary across contexts and would presumably be stronger when wildlife contraceptives are used with the explicit purpose of improving wild animal welfare. The potential for considerable welfare gains for wildlife through the targeted use of contraceptives highlights the importance of both species-specific studies on the welfare benefits of wildlife contraceptives and further research on the links between population dynamics and wild animal welfare.

Simon Eckerström Liedholm

Simon is a Researcher at Wild Animal Initiative. Simon completed his PhD at the Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, focusing on the relationship between life history and behavior, physiology, and morphology among different species of fish. He has both interest and experience in Bayesian statistics, and has taught statistics for several years to graduate and undergraduate students. Simon is located in Stockholm.

simon.liedholm@wildanimalinitiative.org.


Next
Next

Validating physiological markers as welfare indicators: the case of oxidative stress