The animal welfare of animal warfare: how inter-group interactions affect wild animal wellbeing
Grantee: Dominic Cram
Institution: University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,965
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Meerkats (Suricata suricatta)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal behavior, population ecology, community ecology
Research location: United Kingdom, South Africa
Project summary
Fierce group conflicts are not uniquely human, and many group-living animals regularly engage in “animal warfare.” These inter-group interactions play an influential role in natural population regulation, yet the health and well-being consequences for those involved remain unclear. Conservation and management interventions are currently developed with little understanding of how large-scale conflict affects welfare in wild animals. Given that anthropogenic habitat loss and climate change could increase the frequency of inter-group battles, there is an urgent need to investigate the welfare cost of animal warfare. This research program will investigate the welfare consequences of intergroup interactions and fights in wild Kalahari meerkats (Suricata suricatta). The project will take advantage of an established dataset of meerkat behavior, body weight, territory use, and reproduction, covering more than 500 inter-group interactions over 14 years. Identifying the short- and long-term welfare implications of inter-group interactions in meerkats will shed light on similar animal warfare in group-living insects, fish, birds, and mammals. Clarifying the circumstances that lead to the most harmful battles will provide a first step in understanding how their frequency could be reduced, which could limit the suffering they cause and enhance the welfare of group-living wild animals.
Why we funded this project
This project addresses a neglected topic related to our research priority of understanding conflicts of interest between wild animal groups. We especially appreciate this project’s holistic approach to welfare assessment, its attention to indirect effects (collateral damage) of animal conflicts in the form of costs to orphaned juveniles and the creation of a “landscape of fear,” and the openness of the investigators to considering interventions that could elevate wild animal welfare above its natural baseline.
Photos
