Characterization of fecal oxytocin and immunoglobulin A in lions (Panthera leo): Exploring a multi-biomarker approach in animal welfare research

Grantee: Paula Serres Corral

Institution: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain

Grant amount: $25,385

Grant type: Small grants

Focal species: Lion (Panthera leo)

Conservation status: Vulnerable

Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science

Research location: Spain

---

Project summary

Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the most common physiological indicators of stress and, by extension, of animal welfare. However, welfare means more than stress, and therefore there is a need to develop complementary biomarkers to expand our knowledge of animals’ overall welfare states, both positive and negative. This project will consider oxytocin (OT) and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), markers of neuroendocrine and immune function respectively, which have been proposed as potential indicators of positive affective states. So far, both indicators have been reliably measured in the saliva and urine of a limited set of wild mammalian species. However, previous work on their analysis in fecal samples has been even more limited. This project aims to validate the measurement of OT and IgA in feces of lions (Panthera leo) as a model for social carnivores and evaluate their applicability as additional physiological indicators in wildlife welfare studies. The researchers will evaluate baseline levels for the species based on a small number of captive individuals, and assess how these biomarkers are correlated with GCs and behavior.

Why we funded this project

With a multi-biomarker approach, these potential biomarkers, in combination with GCs, will enable a more robust interpretation of findings in welfare assessments. We are especially interested in the potential for these physiological indicators to support identification of positive welfare states in wild animals, considering the crucial role of oxytocin, for example, in social bonding. Although the project itself is limited to a small number of captive individuals, we expect that this project will represent a significant step towards validating these putative indicators of positive welfare thanks to the detailed behavioral monitoring that the captive environment allows, including a Quantitative Behavioral Assessment (QBA) approach.

---

Photos

---

Improving the welfare of translocated individuals - European mink as a case study

Grantee: Maria Diez Leon

Institution: University of London, United Kingdom

Grant amount: $28,965

Grant type: Small grants

Focal species: European mink (Mustela lutreola)

Conservation status: Critically endangered

Disciplines: Wildlife rehabilitation, animal welfare science

Research location: Spain

---

Project summary

Conservation breeding programs do not proactively consider or even assess welfare across all stages, nor track the welfare of released individuals. We therefore lack data on how individual welfare state pre-release might affect welfare post-release. This project aims to fill the gap by assessing how levels of two behaviors thought to track positive and negative welfare states — play behaviors and abnormal repetitive behaviors — influence post-release welfare metrics in two on-going reintroduction programs for the European mink, and compare the welfare of released minks to individuals in an established “benchmark” wild population. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolite levels will also be measured to validate these behavioral indicators pre- and post-release. By differentially raising mink in conditions known to improve welfare, the researchers will investigate whether captive environments that promote play and decrease abnormal repetitive behaviors improve pre-release and post-release welfare, whether individual welfare state pre-release correlates with post-release welfare outcomes, and how the welfare of captive-born individuals differs from that of wild-born individuals. 

Why we funded this project

We are interested in the comparison of long-term welfare outcomes between individuals born and protected in captivity and individuals born in the wild, which can help us understand how welfare issues differ between captive and wild environments and how much early-life experiences influence long-term welfare. The project’s objective of identifying improvements for the early-life care of animals who are to be released into the wild also helps us assess “headstarting,” a practice in which juveniles of a species are reared in captivity before being released at a less dangerous life stage, as a near-term intervention for improving the lifetime welfare of animals who have vulnerable juvenile stages but are relatively long-lived as adults. Finally, the applicant has a background in conservation but has demonstrated a long-term interest in wild animal welfare, such as attending an April 2022 workshop on animal sentience (LSE/Rethink Priorities).

Find Maria’s other project, studying American minks and Eurasian otters, here.

---

Photos

---