Meet our grantees
Wild Animal Initiative funds academic research on high-priority questions in wild animal welfare.
The goal of our grants program is to fund research that deepens scientific knowledge of the welfare of wild animals in order to better understand how to improve the welfare of as many wild animals as possible, regardless of what causes the threats to their well-being.
We showcase our grantees and their projects here and continuously update this page as new projects are added.
Determination of Fecal Tri-iodothyronine and Cortisol as Physiological Proxies of Animal Welfare
Grantees: Michael Cherry, Joe Hediger
Institutions: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth
Project summary
Wild animals are susceptible to the effects of thermal stress imposed by a warming climate, including increased energetic costs to maintain a healthy body temperature, immune system impairment, changes in food availability, and increases in disease transmission. White-tailed deer in southern Texas are on the front lines of this challenge. This project aims to assess the reliability of fecal tri-iodothyronine (T3) and fecal glucocorticoids (FGC) as non-invasive physiological metrics for monitoring their health. The use of T3 as an indicator of wildlife health and welfare is relatively novel, and the researchers will attempt to refine it through controlled experiments, correlating the T3 measurements with a more widely used indicator in FGC. Both physiological indicators will be validated against behavioral observations.
Grantees: Michael Cherry, Joe Hediger
Institutions: Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, United States
Grant amount: $25,860
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: United States
Project summary
Wildlife are susceptible to both direct and indirect effects of thermal stress imposed by a warming climate. Direct effects include increased energetic costs to maintain a healthy body temperature and immune system impairment, while indirect effects include changes in food availability and increases in disease transmission. White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in southern Texas are on the front lines of this environmental challenge. This project aims to assess the reliability of fecal tri-iodothyronine (T3) and fecal glucocorticoids (FGC) as non-invasive physiological metrics for monitoring the health of white-tailed deer. The use of T3 as an indicator of wildlife health and welfare is relatively novel, and the researchers will attempt to refine the use of these metrics through controlled experiments, correlating the T3 measurements with a more widely used indicator in FGC. Both physiological indicators will also be validated against behavioral observations of the same deer that are thought to reflect their emotional state.
Why we funded this project
The study findings will help in understanding how wild animals cope with increasing temperatures and the impact of thermal stress on their welfare and health. Notably, previous work has suggested that T3 measurements in ungulates are especially sensitive to thermal stress, and so comparing T3 with other indicators based on different physiological pathways, such as glucocorticoids, could help researchers to diagnose the relative significance of different environmental stressors an animal is facing. The project’s behavioral metrics are also crucial for realizing that potential. A secondary reason for our interest in this project is that it has near-term policy implications, potentially highlighting the value of preserving or promoting specific landscape features for the ecosystem service they offer, in the form of shade, to wild ungulates.
Photos
Validation and efficacy of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites as indicators of animal welfare
Grantee: Miriam Zemanova
Institutions: University of Fribourg, Animalfree Research, Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics
Project summary
Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGM) may be a suitable non-invasive alternative to blood analysis in animal welfare studies. While there have been several reviews of fecal glucocorticoids, no systematic review of their validity as an animal welfare indicator has been done. Through a systematic review process, this project seeks to provide an evidence base for the efficacy of non-invasive measurement of stress levels in wild animals using fecal glucocorticoids. Evidence will be compiled from studies that have assessed the correlation between fecal glucocorticoids and at least one other credible animal welfare indicator or factor that may be assumed to lead to impaired welfare. The project also aims to compare the performances of blood and fecal samples to assess stress levels.
Grantee: Miriam Zemanova
Institution: University of Fribourg, Animalfree Research, Switzerland, Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $28,500
Grant type: Small grants
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: Switzerland, United Kingdom
Project summary
One of the central components of the stress response is the production of glucocorticoids (GC). The measurement of glucocorticoid levels in blood serum is therefore often used in animal welfare studies. However, it is not always apparent how valuable these measurements are for understanding stress reactions and their relationship to animal welfare. Moreover, blood sampling causes discomfort and is impossible without restraint or immobilization, which can be harmful to the animal and distort the experimental results. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGM) may be a suitable non-invasive alternative to blood analysis. While there have been several reviews written on fecal glucocorticoids, no systematic review of their validity as an animal welfare indicator is currently available. Therefore, through a systematic review process, this project seeks to provide an evidence base for the efficacy of non-invasive measurement of stress levels in wild animals using fecal glucocorticoids. Evidence will be compiled from studies that have assessed the correlation between fecal glucocorticoids and at least one other credible animal welfare indicator or factor that may be assumed to lead to impaired welfare. The project also aims to compare the performances of blood and fecal samples to assess stress levels.
Why we funded this project
This study will review the evidence base for the validity and efficacy of non-invasively obtained glucocorticoid measurements and identify both challenges and best practices for working with fecal samples across multiple animal taxa. This is important because WAI is supporting multiple projects utilizing FGM as a physiological welfare indicator. Invasive measurements of stress, such as blood-based GCs, are disadvantageous because, without proper strategy and training, the stress induced by the sampling procedure can influence the measurement. Therefore, non-invasive measurement techniques are not only better for the animals, but may make the science less expensive and more reliable. Another reason we are supporting this study is that it will help to address a general need for better validation of the link between glucocorticoids and animal welfare, which is related to but conceptually distinct from physiological stress.
Photos
Characterization of fecal oxytocin and immunoglobulin A in lions (Panthera leo): Exploring a multi-biomarker approach in animal welfare research
Grantee: Paula Serres Corral
Institution: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Project summary
This project will validate the measurement of oxytocin (OT) and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), markers of neuroendocrine and immune function, as biomarkers of wild animals’ welfare states. Both indicators have been measured in the saliva and urine of a limited set of wild mammalian species, but work on their analysis in fecal samples has been even more limited. This project will validate the measurement of OT and IgA in the feces of lions as a model for social carnivores, and evaluate their applicability as additional physiological indicators in wild animal welfare studies. The researchers will evaluate baseline levels for the species based on a small number of captive individuals and assess how these biomarkers are correlated with GCs and behavior.
Grantee: Paula Serres Corral
Institution: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Grant amount: $25,385
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Lion (Panthera leo)
Conservation status: Vulnerable
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: Spain
Project summary
Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the most common physiological indicators of stress and, by extension, of animal welfare. However, welfare means more than stress, and therefore there is a need to develop complementary biomarkers to expand our knowledge of animals’ overall welfare states, both positive and negative. This project will consider oxytocin (OT) and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA), markers of neuroendocrine and immune function respectively, which have been proposed as potential indicators of positive affective states. So far, both indicators have been reliably measured in the saliva and urine of a limited set of wild mammalian species. However, previous work on their analysis in fecal samples has been even more limited. This project aims to validate the measurement of OT and IgA in feces of lions (Panthera leo) as a model for social carnivores and evaluate their applicability as additional physiological indicators in wildlife welfare studies. The researchers will evaluate baseline levels for the species based on a small number of captive individuals, and assess how these biomarkers are correlated with GCs and behavior.
Why we funded this project
With a multi-biomarker approach, these potential biomarkers, in combination with GCs, will enable a more robust interpretation of findings in welfare assessments. We are especially interested in the potential for these physiological indicators to support identification of positive welfare states in wild animals, considering the crucial role of oxytocin, for example, in social bonding. Although the project itself is limited to a small number of captive individuals, we expect that this project will represent a significant step towards validating these putative indicators of positive welfare thanks to the detailed behavioral monitoring that the captive environment allows, including a Quantitative Behavioral Assessment (QBA) approach.
Photos
Thermal imaging as a non-invasive welfare assessment tool for tracking the impact of environmental stressors across wild animal populations
Grantee: Ross MacLeod
Institutions: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
This project aims to test and validate a standardized multi-species approach to monitoring physiological stress in wild birds by using thermal imaging cameras to measure the animals’ body surface temperature, which could enable tracking of chronic stress in wild populations facing environmental stressors. Building on pilot work, the project will focus on wild bird populations to develop a standardized thermal imaging methodology capable of monitoring surface temperature of a wide range of wild animals. The methodology will be validated using bird communities visiting 54 standardized feeding and drinking stations spread across the UK, to quantify how changes in surface temperature are linked to starvation risk, predation risk, and human disturbance.
Grantee: Ross MacLeod
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,810
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Wild birds
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science, population ecology, ornithology
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
This project aims to test and validate a standardized multi-species approach to monitoring physiological stress in wild birds by using thermal imaging cameras to measure the animals’ body surface temperature, which could enable tracking of chronic stress in wild populations facing different levels of environmental stressors. Building on pilot work, the project will focus on wild bird populations to develop a standardized thermal imaging methodology capable of monitoring surface temperature of a wide range of free-living wild animals. The methodology will be validated using bird communities visiting 54 standardized feeding and drinking stations spread across three urban-rural gradients in the UK, to quantify how changes in surface temperature are linked to starvation risk, predation risk, and human disturbance.
Why we funded this project
This approach to measuring wild animals’ physiological stress levels through thermal imaging analysis has great potential for scalable monitoring of large numbers of individuals and is usable for cross-species comparisons. We appreciated that this team was interested in addressing non-anthropogenic causes of suffering in starvation and predation, and in extending their method to other species that tend to be neglected (e.g., wild rodents). This work also relates to the project by Paul Jerem that we previously funded, creating a longer-term relationship between Wild Animal Initiative and project participants.
Find Ross’ other project, studying house sparrows, here.
Photos
Developing loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for detecting pathogens in wild animal populations
Grantee: Cameron Semper
Institutions: University of Calgary, University of Lethbridge
Project summary
This project aims to develop Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays for rapid, in situ detection of representative viral and bacterial pathogens, as well as parasitic worm infections in wild animals. This project will develop two methods for detecting viral and bacterial infections, respectively. The viral test will focus on viruses that have caused epidemics in wild frigatebird and sooty tern populations, while the bacterial test will focus on tick-borne illnesses and parasitic worms which infect deer mice. After developing the LAMP assays, the researchers will validate their potential contribution to monitoring wild animal welfare in a non-invasive manner by using them to test for pathogenic load in fecal samples from deer mice.
Grantee: Cameron Semper
Institution: University of Calgary, University of Lethbridge, Canada
Grant amount: $30,000
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Deer mice (Peromyscus sp.)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Infectious disease, physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: Canada
Project summary
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a low-cost technique that amplifies specific DNA to levels that can enable visual detection. LAMP has been extensively applied as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for human health, but its application in wild animal populations remains underexplored. This project aims to develop LAMP assays for rapid, in situ detection of representative viral and bacterial pathogens as well as parasitic worm infections in wild animals. This project will develop two methods for detecting viral and bacterial infections, respectively. The viral test will focus on viruses that have caused epidemics in wild frigatebird and sooty tern populations, while the bacterial test will focus on tick-borne illnesses and parasitic worms which infect deer mice. After developing the LAMP assays, the researchers will validate their potential contribution to monitoring wild animal welfare in a non-invasive manner by using them to test for pathogenic load in fecal samples from deer mice.
Why we funded this project
This research will serve as a proof-of-concept for the applicability of LAMP for monitoring infectious disease, a key determinant of wild animal welfare. Additionally, the project is specifically targeting diseases that affect a large number of animals. LAMP is simple to perform, and results can be interpreted visually without the need for sophisticated equipment, reducing the cost in time and materials for assessing disease in wild animals. Because it can be carried out in the field, follow-up treatment or further study can be immediately given to the same animal.
Photos
Raman spectroscopy as a novel non-invasive technique to assess wildlife welfare
Grantee: Teresa Romero
Institutions: University of Lincoln, University of Portsmouth
Project summary
Analysis of hormones accumulated in the hair has emerged as a non-invasive tool for measuring chronic stress in wildlife, but hair analyses are currently limited by variation in cortisol concentrations. This project will test whether Raman spectroscopy, which is suitable for the field and does not require sample pre-treatment, is a better way to use hair samples to assess steroid hormones. The planned methodology will make use of samples of mammalian hair with a known cortisol content using a control technique — liquid chromatography mass spectrometry — for comparison. The samples will be subjected to analysis by Raman to validate the technique and establish a robust analytical methodology for the non-invasive analysis of welfare biomarkers in wildlife.
Grantee: Teresa Romero
Institution: University of Lincoln, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $19,100
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella)
Conservation status: Critically endangered
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
Steroid hormones are routinely used as biomarkers of stress and can be measured in different biological matrices, such as serum, saliva, feces, and urine. However, commonly used collection methods in wildlife are challenging; the stress they induce in the animals may affect hormone levels and also presents ethical issues. More recently, analysis of hormones accumulated in the hair has emerged as a non-invasive tool for measuring chronic stress in wildlife, but current limitations of hair analyses include variation in cortisol concentrations depending on sample preparation and the amount of hair required for cortisol extraction. This project will test whether Raman spectroscopy, which is suitable for the field and does not require sample pre-treatment, is a better way to use hair samples to assess steroid hormones. The planned methodology will make use of samples of mammalian hair with a known cortisol content using a control technique — liquid chromatography mass spectrometry — for comparison. The samples will be subjected to analysis by Raman to validate the technique and establish a robust analytical methodology for the non-invasive analysis of welfare biomarkers in wildlife.
Why we funded this project
Although this project is focused on development of chemical methods, we expect that the method, if validated, could make glucocorticoid assessment in the hair of wild animals much easier, increasing the future quantity and quality of that type of data. Hair is an especially interesting medium for glucocorticoid analysis because it integrates glucocorticoid levels in the body over time, causing the measurements to be more stable over time and potentially more indicative of baseline welfare, since the values are less sensitive to an animal’s most recent activities.
Photos
Paying to play? Social time allocation, emotional contagion, and social attention as assays of welfare in wild animals
Grantee: Patrick Tkaczynski
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
Play and grooming have a number of facets that could be potential indicators of positive welfare in group-living vertebrates, but analysis of such behaviors are yet to be put into a formal framework for monitoring wild animal populations. This pilot project will focus on six different wild Barbary macaque groups of variable sizes and facing varying degrees of human exposure, which is typically associated with poor health outcomes in wild animals. It will use play and grooming behavior to quantify social time allocation, emotional contagion/synchronization, and social attention as potential assays of positive welfare. Once validated, these assays can be applied to examine how positive welfare varies across different gradients, such as climate change or variation in predator pressure.
Grantee: Patrick Tkaczynski
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,323
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus)
Conservation status: Endangered
Disciplines: Animal welfare science, animal behavior
Research location: Morocco, United Kingdom
Project summary
For group-living vertebrates, play and grooming have a number of facets that could be potential indicators of positive welfare, but analysis of such behaviors are yet to be put into a formal framework for monitoring wild animal populations. The Middle Atlas region of Morocco hosts one of the largest populations of wild Barbary macaques, an endangered primate species. These animals face a number of environmental challenges that may disrupt positive social experiences, including anthropogenic disturbance, threats from natural and introduced predators, and an extreme climate. Focusing on six different macaque groups with variable group sizes and facing varying degrees of human exposure, this pilot project will use play and grooming behavior to quantify social time allocation, emotional contagion/synchronization, and social attention as potential assays of positive welfare. As human exposure is typically associated with poor health outcomes in wild animals, this pilot project will focus on this specific environmental challenge to help validate our assays, which can later be applied to examine how positive welfare varies across different gradients, such as climate change or variation in predator pressure.
Why we funded this project
Most animal welfare research is focused on minimizing suffering, but it’s also vital to maximize positive experiences. The links between positive welfare and evolutionary fitness are also less obvious than for negative welfare, where factors like poor health seem to be associated with both poor welfare and low evolutionary fitness. Because more research focuses on fitness than welfare, the unclear relationship between fitness and positive welfare has contributed to the neglectedness of indicators of positive welfare. This project was one of the few we received that addressed the theme of positive welfare, and we hope that this pilot in primates will provide information to support similar studies in other social species.
Photos
Novel epigenetic approaches to measure wild animal welfare and stress
Grantee: Dave Daversa
Institution: University of California, Los Angeles
Project summary
A challenge in wild animal welfare science is developing composite assays that consider the full breadth of factors collectively shaping subjective experiences. This project will demonstrate proof of concept for a DNA methylation (DNAm)-based model of wild animal welfare, characterizing DNAm in western toads. It will test the influence of infection with Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on DNAm and its covariance with demographic factors such as age, sex, and body condition. Captive-reared toads will be sampled to characterize DNAm under controlled conditions, providing a standardized profile of DNAm rates over toad life stages. The researchers will then sample toads from wild populations experiencing starkly different levels of Bd infection, with accelerated biological aging signaling elevated stress and impaired welfare.
Grantee: Dave Daversa
Institution: University of California, Los Angeles, United States
Grant amount: $30,000
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Western toad (Anaxyrus boreas)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Physiology, herpetology, animal welfare science, population ecology, genetics/genomics
Research location: United States
Project summary
A major challenge in wild animal welfare science lies in developing composite assays that consider the full breadth of factors collectively shaping the subjective experiences of animals. This project will apply epigenetic tools to develop minimally invasive and aggregate measures of wild animal welfare. Specifically, the researchers aim to demonstrate proof of concept for a DNA methylation (DNAm)-based model of wild animal welfare. DNAm joins other measurements such as telomere attrition as a biomarker of biological aging, because DNA becomes methylated as a function of both chronological age (time) and accumulated stress. This project will characterize DNAm in western toads (Anaxyrus boreas) from wild populations in southern California, testing the influence of infection with the fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) on DNAm, and its covariance with demographic factors such as age and sex, as well as with body condition, a common metric of physical health in wild animals. Captive-reared toads representing all life stages will be sampled to characterize DNAm under controlled conditions, providing a standardized profile of DNAm rates over toad life stages. The researchers will then sample toads from wild populations experiencing starkly different levels of environmental stress (Bd infection), with accelerated biological aging signaling elevated stress and impaired welfare.
Project objectives
Objective 1: Determine the relationship between DNAm and basic risk factors linked to welfare: chronological age, sex, weight, and infection status.
Objective 2: Determine the effect of environmental stressors on epigenetic age.
Why we funded this project
We funded this project because we are interested in the potential for biological aging biomarkers to be used as very long-term, integrative metrics of animals’ lifetime welfare. DNAm is one such potential biomarker that has received relatively little attention in a welfare context. However, DNAm may potentially be easier to measure than more commonly discussed measures of biological age — or at least, be more familiar for mainstream ecological genetics researchers — because DNA methylation is already of interest for other reasons in biological science. We were particularly enthusiastic about this project because it focuses on a species belonging to a large species complex of amphibians, including both common and threatened species, offering broad transferability and potential impact. Amphibians are also relatively neglected in terms of welfare research. We appreciate that this project aims to establish baseline age-specific differences in biological aging rate in order to then assess age-specific differences attributable to different exposures (i.e., age-specific differences in welfare), which connects to the concept of “welfare expectancy” developed by Wild Animal Initiative researcher Luke Hecht.
Find Dave’s other project, studying western fence lizards, here.
Photos
Developing an approach for assessing the welfare of wild birds through the use of bioacoustics analysis
Grantee: Luiza Figueiredo Passos
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
Vocalization analysis has been used to monitor the welfare of farmed animals and animals in laboratories, but lacks validation for wild animals. This project will use passive acoustic monitoring to record wild bird calls throughout the UK. It will identify vocal patterns and chorus characteristics related to various environmental risks that can be used to infer the welfare status of local bird populations across multiple environments. The focal species will be house sparrows, who have undergone a massive population decline and may be facing welfare challenges. Validating acoustic monitoring as a tool for non-invasive welfare monitoring in the wild for the first time will provide a method that could be used to monitor the welfare of wild birds globally.
Grantees: Luiza Figueiredo Passos
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,060
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: House sparrow (Passer domesticus)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal welfare science, ornithology, population ecology, animal behavior
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
Vocalisations carry emotional, physiological, and individual information, suggesting that they can serve as potentially useful non-invasive indicators for inferring wild animal welfare. Communication of affective states via vocalization is due to changes in emotions leading to deviations in the nervous system, causing physiological changes within the vocal production systems. Modern sound analysis techniques have provided tools to discriminate, analyze, and classify specific vocalizations, permitting them to be used for monitoring welfare of different farm and laboratory animals. However, this approach lacks validation for wild individuals. This proposal aims to use passive acoustic monitoring to record wild bird calls at different locations in urban, rural, and conservation-managed areas in the UK. This project will follow a comparative approach to identify vocal patterns and chorus characteristics related to different environmental risks (starvation risk, predation risk, human disturbance, etc.) so that these vocal signatures can be used to infer the welfare status of local bird populations across different environments. The focal species will be one of Europe’s most common species, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). House sparrows provide an ideal first validation as the species has undergone a massive population decline in many parts of its range over the past 50 years, suggesting that its local populations are facing significant welfare challenges. Validating acoustic monitoring as a tool for non-invasive welfare monitoring in the wild for the first time will provide the basis for future application to birds in general, providing a method that could be used to monitor welfare and changes in welfare of wild birds at any location globally.
Project objectives
Objective 1: Evaluate how changes in sparrow welfare driven by changes in risk of starvation can be indicated by changes in the vocal signatures of local populations.
Objective 2: Understand relationship between predation risk driven changes in sparrows’ welfare and the vocal signatures of local populations.
Objective 3: Impact of human disturbance on sparrows’ welfare.
Why we funded this project
This project is very similar to projects by Claudia Wascher and Sam Reynolds. As stated, bioacoustic monitoring is an extremely promising approach because it is minimally invasive and inexpensive. However, it still needs to be validated, and given its potential future value, we felt that it would be best for it to be validated by at least two independent studies. This project was especially appealing because it focuses on such a ubiquitous species (the house sparrow) and is led by a researcher with a strong record in bioacoustics and an understanding of animal welfare science.
Find Luiza’s other project, studying wild newts, here.
Photos
Assessing animal welfare from bioacoustic monitoring in red-billed choughs (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax)
Grantee: Claudia Wascher
Institution: Anglia Ruskin University
Project summary
Bioacoustic monitoring is a well established method of measuring welfare in captive animals, but has not been used in wild animals. This project will assess and validate the use of passive bioacoustic monitoring to assess welfare in a reintroduced population of red-billed choughs. The researchers will conduct a combination of automatic acoustic monitoring using “passive” acoustic recorders and direct observations (recording behavior via videos and monitoring activity during the night with night vision scopes) and “active” acoustic monitoring, using a high-quality directional microphone and parabolic dish. Their approach will allow them to record vocalizations and behavior during natural events expected to influence welfare, such as anthropogenic noise, predation events, intraspecific aggression, resting, or affiliative behaviors.
Grantees: Claudia Wascher
Institution: Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $18,679
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal welfare science, ornithology, population ecology, animal behavior
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
In principle, animal vocalizations can be used to identify both positive and negative experiences. Specific vocal characteristics (e.g., mean fundamental frequency) and the rate of occurrence of certain call types can help to quantify animal welfare and are well-established in farm animals such as pigs, horses, cows, and chickens. But although bioacoustic monitoring is a well-established method in captive animals, the method has not been used in wild animals to assess positive and negative emotional states. This project will assess and validate the use of passive bioacoustic monitoring to assess welfare in a reintroduced population of red-billed choughs. The researchers will conduct a combination of automatic acoustic monitoring using “passive” acoustic recorders and direct observations (recording behavior via videos, monitoring activity during the night with night vision scopes, and “active” acoustic monitoring using high-quality directional microphone and parabolic dish). Their approach will allow them to record vocalizations and behavior during natural events expected to influence welfare, such as anthropogenic noise, predation events, intraspecific aggression, resting, or affiliative behaviors.
Why we funded this project
This project will help to validate the use of passive acoustic monitoring to assess welfare states from variation in vocal behavior, which presents a non-invasive, cost-effective tool to assess the impact of positive and negative events on animal welfare. In theory, acoustic monitoring could be used to assess the welfare of a large number of individuals at a time, making it a particularly promising method to investigate.
Photos
