Meet our grantees
Wild Animal Initiative funds academic research on high-priority questions in wild animal welfare.
The goal of our grants program is to fund research that deepens scientific knowledge of the welfare of wild animals in order to better understand how to improve the welfare of as many wild animals as possible, regardless of what causes the threats to their well-being.
We showcase our grantees and their projects here and continuously update this page as new projects are added.
Social connections and their welfare implications in the wild
Grantee: Alex Thornton
Institutions: University of Exeter, University of Bristol
Project summary
This project seeks to understand the relationship between welfare and social interactions in wild bird populations. Using historical data, the researchers will also seek insight into how welfare varies among individuals in relation to the social system, early-life experiences, and interactions among individuals. They will also investigate whether social systems might play a role in helping to mitigate some of the negative anthropogenic impacts on welfare.
Grantee: Alex Thornton
Institutions: University of Exeter, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $157,962
Grant type: Challenge grants
Focal species: Jackdaws (Coloeus sp.)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal behavior, ornithology, animal welfare science
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
This project seeks to understand the relationship between welfare and social interactions in wild bird populations. Using historical data, the researchers will also seek insight into how welfare varies among individuals in relation to the social system, early-life experiences, and interactions among individuals. They will also investigate whether social systems might play a role in helping to mitigate some of the negative anthropogenic impacts on welfare.
Why we funded this project
The study findings will help in understanding how wild animals cope with increasing temperatures and the impact of thermal stress on their welfare and health. Notably, previous work has suggested that T3 measurements in ungulates are especially sensitive to thermal stress, and so comparing T3 with other indicators based on different physiological pathways, such as glucocorticoids, could help researchers to diagnose the relative significance of different environmental stressors an animal is facing. The project’s behavioral metrics are also crucial for realizing that potential. A secondary reason for our interest in this project is that it has near-term policy implications, potentially highlighting the value of preserving or promoting specific landscape features for the ecosystem service they offer, in the form of shade, to wild ungulates.
Photos
Validation and efficacy of faecal glucocorticoid metabolites as indicators of animal welfare
Grantee: Miriam Zemanova
Institutions: University of Fribourg, Animalfree Research, Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics
Project summary
Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGM) may be a suitable non-invasive alternative to blood analysis in animal welfare studies. While there have been several reviews of fecal glucocorticoids, no systematic review of their validity as an animal welfare indicator has been done. Through a systematic review process, this project seeks to provide an evidence base for the efficacy of non-invasive measurement of stress levels in wild animals using fecal glucocorticoids. Evidence will be compiled from studies that have assessed the correlation between fecal glucocorticoids and at least one other credible animal welfare indicator or factor that may be assumed to lead to impaired welfare. The project also aims to compare the performances of blood and fecal samples to assess stress levels.
Grantee: Miriam Zemanova
Institution: University of Fribourg, Animalfree Research, Switzerland, Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $28,500
Grant type: Small grants
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: Switzerland, United Kingdom
Project summary
One of the central components of the stress response is the production of glucocorticoids (GC). The measurement of glucocorticoid levels in blood serum is therefore often used in animal welfare studies. However, it is not always apparent how valuable these measurements are for understanding stress reactions and their relationship to animal welfare. Moreover, blood sampling causes discomfort and is impossible without restraint or immobilization, which can be harmful to the animal and distort the experimental results. Fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGM) may be a suitable non-invasive alternative to blood analysis. While there have been several reviews written on fecal glucocorticoids, no systematic review of their validity as an animal welfare indicator is currently available. Therefore, through a systematic review process, this project seeks to provide an evidence base for the efficacy of non-invasive measurement of stress levels in wild animals using fecal glucocorticoids. Evidence will be compiled from studies that have assessed the correlation between fecal glucocorticoids and at least one other credible animal welfare indicator or factor that may be assumed to lead to impaired welfare. The project also aims to compare the performances of blood and fecal samples to assess stress levels.
Why we funded this project
This study will review the evidence base for the validity and efficacy of non-invasively obtained glucocorticoid measurements and identify both challenges and best practices for working with fecal samples across multiple animal taxa. This is important because WAI is supporting multiple projects utilizing FGM as a physiological welfare indicator. Invasive measurements of stress, such as blood-based GCs, are disadvantageous because, without proper strategy and training, the stress induced by the sampling procedure can influence the measurement. Therefore, non-invasive measurement techniques are not only better for the animals, but may make the science less expensive and more reliable. Another reason we are supporting this study is that it will help to address a general need for better validation of the link between glucocorticoids and animal welfare, which is related to but conceptually distinct from physiological stress.
Photos
Thermal imaging as a non-invasive welfare assessment tool for tracking the impact of environmental stressors across wild animal populations
Grantee: Ross MacLeod
Institutions: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
This project aims to test and validate a standardized multi-species approach to monitoring physiological stress in wild birds by using thermal imaging cameras to measure the animals’ body surface temperature, which could enable tracking of chronic stress in wild populations facing environmental stressors. Building on pilot work, the project will focus on wild bird populations to develop a standardized thermal imaging methodology capable of monitoring surface temperature of a wide range of wild animals. The methodology will be validated using bird communities visiting 54 standardized feeding and drinking stations spread across the UK, to quantify how changes in surface temperature are linked to starvation risk, predation risk, and human disturbance.
Grantee: Ross MacLeod
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,810
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Wild birds
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science, population ecology, ornithology
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
This project aims to test and validate a standardized multi-species approach to monitoring physiological stress in wild birds by using thermal imaging cameras to measure the animals’ body surface temperature, which could enable tracking of chronic stress in wild populations facing different levels of environmental stressors. Building on pilot work, the project will focus on wild bird populations to develop a standardized thermal imaging methodology capable of monitoring surface temperature of a wide range of free-living wild animals. The methodology will be validated using bird communities visiting 54 standardized feeding and drinking stations spread across three urban-rural gradients in the UK, to quantify how changes in surface temperature are linked to starvation risk, predation risk, and human disturbance.
Why we funded this project
This approach to measuring wild animals’ physiological stress levels through thermal imaging analysis has great potential for scalable monitoring of large numbers of individuals and is usable for cross-species comparisons. We appreciated that this team was interested in addressing non-anthropogenic causes of suffering in starvation and predation, and in extending their method to other species that tend to be neglected (e.g., wild rodents). This work also relates to the project by Paul Jerem that we previously funded, creating a longer-term relationship between Wild Animal Initiative and project participants.
Find Ross’ other project, studying house sparrows, here.
Photos
Raman spectroscopy as a novel non-invasive technique to assess wildlife welfare
Grantee: Teresa Romero
Institutions: University of Lincoln, University of Portsmouth
Project summary
Analysis of hormones accumulated in the hair has emerged as a non-invasive tool for measuring chronic stress in wildlife, but hair analyses are currently limited by variation in cortisol concentrations. This project will test whether Raman spectroscopy, which is suitable for the field and does not require sample pre-treatment, is a better way to use hair samples to assess steroid hormones. The planned methodology will make use of samples of mammalian hair with a known cortisol content using a control technique — liquid chromatography mass spectrometry — for comparison. The samples will be subjected to analysis by Raman to validate the technique and establish a robust analytical methodology for the non-invasive analysis of welfare biomarkers in wildlife.
Grantee: Teresa Romero
Institution: University of Lincoln, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $19,100
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella)
Conservation status: Critically endangered
Disciplines: Physiology, animal welfare science
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
Steroid hormones are routinely used as biomarkers of stress and can be measured in different biological matrices, such as serum, saliva, feces, and urine. However, commonly used collection methods in wildlife are challenging; the stress they induce in the animals may affect hormone levels and also presents ethical issues. More recently, analysis of hormones accumulated in the hair has emerged as a non-invasive tool for measuring chronic stress in wildlife, but current limitations of hair analyses include variation in cortisol concentrations depending on sample preparation and the amount of hair required for cortisol extraction. This project will test whether Raman spectroscopy, which is suitable for the field and does not require sample pre-treatment, is a better way to use hair samples to assess steroid hormones. The planned methodology will make use of samples of mammalian hair with a known cortisol content using a control technique — liquid chromatography mass spectrometry — for comparison. The samples will be subjected to analysis by Raman to validate the technique and establish a robust analytical methodology for the non-invasive analysis of welfare biomarkers in wildlife.
Why we funded this project
Although this project is focused on development of chemical methods, we expect that the method, if validated, could make glucocorticoid assessment in the hair of wild animals much easier, increasing the future quantity and quality of that type of data. Hair is an especially interesting medium for glucocorticoid analysis because it integrates glucocorticoid levels in the body over time, causing the measurements to be more stable over time and potentially more indicative of baseline welfare, since the values are less sensitive to an animal’s most recent activities.
Photos
Paying to play? Social time allocation, emotional contagion, and social attention as assays of welfare in wild animals
Grantee: Patrick Tkaczynski
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
Play and grooming have a number of facets that could be potential indicators of positive welfare in group-living vertebrates, but analysis of such behaviors are yet to be put into a formal framework for monitoring wild animal populations. This pilot project will focus on six different wild Barbary macaque groups of variable sizes and facing varying degrees of human exposure, which is typically associated with poor health outcomes in wild animals. It will use play and grooming behavior to quantify social time allocation, emotional contagion/synchronization, and social attention as potential assays of positive welfare. Once validated, these assays can be applied to examine how positive welfare varies across different gradients, such as climate change or variation in predator pressure.
Grantee: Patrick Tkaczynski
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,323
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Barbary macaque (Macaca sylvanus)
Conservation status: Endangered
Disciplines: Animal welfare science, animal behavior
Research location: Morocco, United Kingdom
Project summary
For group-living vertebrates, play and grooming have a number of facets that could be potential indicators of positive welfare, but analysis of such behaviors are yet to be put into a formal framework for monitoring wild animal populations. The Middle Atlas region of Morocco hosts one of the largest populations of wild Barbary macaques, an endangered primate species. These animals face a number of environmental challenges that may disrupt positive social experiences, including anthropogenic disturbance, threats from natural and introduced predators, and an extreme climate. Focusing on six different macaque groups with variable group sizes and facing varying degrees of human exposure, this pilot project will use play and grooming behavior to quantify social time allocation, emotional contagion/synchronization, and social attention as potential assays of positive welfare. As human exposure is typically associated with poor health outcomes in wild animals, this pilot project will focus on this specific environmental challenge to help validate our assays, which can later be applied to examine how positive welfare varies across different gradients, such as climate change or variation in predator pressure.
Why we funded this project
Most animal welfare research is focused on minimizing suffering, but it’s also vital to maximize positive experiences. The links between positive welfare and evolutionary fitness are also less obvious than for negative welfare, where factors like poor health seem to be associated with both poor welfare and low evolutionary fitness. Because more research focuses on fitness than welfare, the unclear relationship between fitness and positive welfare has contributed to the neglectedness of indicators of positive welfare. This project was one of the few we received that addressed the theme of positive welfare, and we hope that this pilot in primates will provide information to support similar studies in other social species.
Photos
Developing an approach for assessing the welfare of wild birds through the use of bioacoustics analysis
Grantee: Luiza Figueiredo Passos
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University
Project summary
Vocalization analysis has been used to monitor the welfare of farmed animals and animals in laboratories, but lacks validation for wild animals. This project will use passive acoustic monitoring to record wild bird calls throughout the UK. It will identify vocal patterns and chorus characteristics related to various environmental risks that can be used to infer the welfare status of local bird populations across multiple environments. The focal species will be house sparrows, who have undergone a massive population decline and may be facing welfare challenges. Validating acoustic monitoring as a tool for non-invasive welfare monitoring in the wild for the first time will provide a method that could be used to monitor the welfare of wild birds globally.
Grantees: Luiza Figueiredo Passos
Institution: Liverpool John Moores University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,060
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: House sparrow (Passer domesticus)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal welfare science, ornithology, population ecology, animal behavior
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
Vocalisations carry emotional, physiological, and individual information, suggesting that they can serve as potentially useful non-invasive indicators for inferring wild animal welfare. Communication of affective states via vocalization is due to changes in emotions leading to deviations in the nervous system, causing physiological changes within the vocal production systems. Modern sound analysis techniques have provided tools to discriminate, analyze, and classify specific vocalizations, permitting them to be used for monitoring welfare of different farm and laboratory animals. However, this approach lacks validation for wild individuals. This proposal aims to use passive acoustic monitoring to record wild bird calls at different locations in urban, rural, and conservation-managed areas in the UK. This project will follow a comparative approach to identify vocal patterns and chorus characteristics related to different environmental risks (starvation risk, predation risk, human disturbance, etc.) so that these vocal signatures can be used to infer the welfare status of local bird populations across different environments. The focal species will be one of Europe’s most common species, the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). House sparrows provide an ideal first validation as the species has undergone a massive population decline in many parts of its range over the past 50 years, suggesting that its local populations are facing significant welfare challenges. Validating acoustic monitoring as a tool for non-invasive welfare monitoring in the wild for the first time will provide the basis for future application to birds in general, providing a method that could be used to monitor welfare and changes in welfare of wild birds at any location globally.
Project objectives
Objective 1: Evaluate how changes in sparrow welfare driven by changes in risk of starvation can be indicated by changes in the vocal signatures of local populations.
Objective 2: Understand relationship between predation risk driven changes in sparrows’ welfare and the vocal signatures of local populations.
Objective 3: Impact of human disturbance on sparrows’ welfare.
Why we funded this project
This project is very similar to projects by Claudia Wascher and Sam Reynolds. As stated, bioacoustic monitoring is an extremely promising approach because it is minimally invasive and inexpensive. However, it still needs to be validated, and given its potential future value, we felt that it would be best for it to be validated by at least two independent studies. This project was especially appealing because it focuses on such a ubiquitous species (the house sparrow) and is led by a researcher with a strong record in bioacoustics and an understanding of animal welfare science.
Find Luiza’s other project, studying wild newts, here.
Photos
Assessing animal welfare from bioacoustic monitoring in red-billed choughs (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax)
Grantee: Claudia Wascher
Institution: Anglia Ruskin University
Project summary
Bioacoustic monitoring is a well established method of measuring welfare in captive animals, but has not been used in wild animals. This project will assess and validate the use of passive bioacoustic monitoring to assess welfare in a reintroduced population of red-billed choughs. The researchers will conduct a combination of automatic acoustic monitoring using “passive” acoustic recorders and direct observations (recording behavior via videos and monitoring activity during the night with night vision scopes) and “active” acoustic monitoring, using a high-quality directional microphone and parabolic dish. Their approach will allow them to record vocalizations and behavior during natural events expected to influence welfare, such as anthropogenic noise, predation events, intraspecific aggression, resting, or affiliative behaviors.
Grantees: Claudia Wascher
Institution: Anglia Ruskin University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $18,679
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Red-billed chough (Pyrrhocorax pyrrhocorax)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal welfare science, ornithology, population ecology, animal behavior
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
In principle, animal vocalizations can be used to identify both positive and negative experiences. Specific vocal characteristics (e.g., mean fundamental frequency) and the rate of occurrence of certain call types can help to quantify animal welfare and are well-established in farm animals such as pigs, horses, cows, and chickens. But although bioacoustic monitoring is a well-established method in captive animals, the method has not been used in wild animals to assess positive and negative emotional states. This project will assess and validate the use of passive bioacoustic monitoring to assess welfare in a reintroduced population of red-billed choughs. The researchers will conduct a combination of automatic acoustic monitoring using “passive” acoustic recorders and direct observations (recording behavior via videos, monitoring activity during the night with night vision scopes, and “active” acoustic monitoring using high-quality directional microphone and parabolic dish). Their approach will allow them to record vocalizations and behavior during natural events expected to influence welfare, such as anthropogenic noise, predation events, intraspecific aggression, resting, or affiliative behaviors.
Why we funded this project
This project will help to validate the use of passive acoustic monitoring to assess welfare states from variation in vocal behavior, which presents a non-invasive, cost-effective tool to assess the impact of positive and negative events on animal welfare. In theory, acoustic monitoring could be used to assess the welfare of a large number of individuals at a time, making it a particularly promising method to investigate.
Photos
Investigating ways to assess and improve the welfare of leopards captured in response to conflict, in Nepal
Grantee: Jessica Bodgener
Institutions: University of Kent, Wildlife Vets International
Project summary
In Nepal, the successful recovery of tiger populations is displacing leopards from protected parks and forcing them into urban areas. This has caused an increase in conflict with people and farmed animals. Organizations responding to conflicts have limited resources and must attempt to balance animal welfare and conservation aims with public safety and sociopolitical demands. This has resulted in an ad hoc approach, with frequent interventions but little opportunity to evaluate their success. This project will focus on validating non-invasive post-release monitoring techniques, including photogrammetric assessment of body condition and measurement of hair cortisol from fecal samples, to monitor the welfare impact of translocation of leopards away from conflict areas.
Grantee: Jessica Bodgener
Institution: University of Kent and Wildlife Vets International, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $16,850
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Leopard (Panthera pardus)
Conservation status: Vulnerable
Disciplines: Wildlife rehabilitation, animal welfare science
Research location: Nepal, United Kingdom
Project summary
Leopards are the most widespread and adaptable of the world’s big cats, occupying a wide variety of habitats ranging from remote rainforests to busy urban centers. In Nepal, the successful recovery of tiger populations is displacing leopards from protected parks and forcing them into more populated areas. Low densities of natural prey in these areas, coupled with an abundance of easily hunted feral dogs around settlements, have resulted in leopards colonizing urban and suburban environments. This has caused an increase in conflict with people, including the predation of farmed animals and occasional human attacks. Organizations responding to conflict events have limited resources and must attempt to balance animal welfare and conservation aims with public safety and sociopolitical demands. This has resulted in an ad hoc approach, with frequent interventions, but little to no opportunity to reflect and evaluate the impact or success of these actions. This project will focus on validating entirely non-invasive post-release monitoring techniques, including photogrammetric assessment of body condition and measurement of hair cortisol from fecal samples, to monitor the impact of translocation of leopards away from conflict areas on their health and welfare.
Why we funded this project
We funded this project because it addresses two of our research priorities by seeking to validate non-invasive monitoring techniques, including hair cortisol as a measurement of chronic stress (which may be more informative of welfare than short-term measures of stress physiology). Although it focuses on leopards, the validation of these methods should be transferable to other species. The researcher, Jess Bodgener, also seems to have a long-term interest in wild animal welfare, and has genuine partnerships in place to build capacity and regard for wild animal welfare in Nepal.
The animal welfare of animal warfare: how inter-group interactions affect wild animal wellbeing
Grantee: Dominic Cram
Institution: University of Cambridge
Project summary
This project will investigate the welfare consequences of inter-group conflicts in wild Kalahari meerkats. It will use an established dataset of meerkat behavior, body weight, territory use, and reproduction, covering more than 500 inter-group interactions over 14 years. Identifying the short- and long-term welfare implications of inter-group interactions in meerkats will shed light on similar animal warfare in group-living insects, fish, birds, and mammals. Clarifying the circumstances that lead to the most harmful battles will provide a first step in understanding how their frequency could be reduced, which could limit the suffering they cause and enhance the welfare of group-living wild animals.
Grantee: Dominic Cram
Institution: University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $29,965
Grant type: Small grants
Focal species: Meerkats (Suricata suricatta)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Animal behavior, population ecology, community ecology
Research location: United Kingdom, South Africa
Project summary
Fierce group conflicts are not uniquely human, and many group-living animals regularly engage in “animal warfare.” These inter-group interactions play an influential role in natural population regulation, yet the health and well-being consequences for those involved remain unclear. Conservation and management interventions are currently developed with little understanding of how large-scale conflict affects welfare in wild animals. Given that anthropogenic habitat loss and climate change could increase the frequency of inter-group battles, there is an urgent need to investigate the welfare cost of animal warfare. This research program will investigate the welfare consequences of intergroup interactions and fights in wild Kalahari meerkats (Suricata suricatta). The project will take advantage of an established dataset of meerkat behavior, body weight, territory use, and reproduction, covering more than 500 inter-group interactions over 14 years. Identifying the short- and long-term welfare implications of inter-group interactions in meerkats will shed light on similar animal warfare in group-living insects, fish, birds, and mammals. Clarifying the circumstances that lead to the most harmful battles will provide a first step in understanding how their frequency could be reduced, which could limit the suffering they cause and enhance the welfare of group-living wild animals.
Why we funded this project
This project addresses a neglected topic related to our research priority of understanding conflicts of interest between wild animal groups. We especially appreciate this project’s holistic approach to welfare assessment, its attention to indirect effects (collateral damage) of animal conflicts in the form of costs to orphaned juveniles and the creation of a “landscape of fear,” and the openness of the investigators to considering interventions that could elevate wild animal welfare above its natural baseline.
Photos
Development of novel measures of welfare in juvenile European starlings exposed to nutritional stress
Grantee: Melissa Bateson
Institution: Newcastle University
Project summary
Nutritional stress causes massive mortality in juvenile European starlings and has lifetime welfare consequences for survivors. The aim of this project is to identify the metabolic “fingerprint” of nutritional stress in starling nestlings and to validate molecular biomarkers that can be used to assess the welfare of wild starlings. This project will use untargeted metabolomics to identify multiple novel biomarkers of exposure to nutritional stress. This “fingerprint” will be validated by testing whether it predicts gold-standard behavioral measures of adult affective experience in a cohort of laboratory-raised birds. The aim will be to identify an applicable panel of metabolites that can be measured from feathers and guano.
Grantee: Melissa Bateson
Institution: Newcastle University, United Kingdom
Grant amount: $60,000
Grant type: Challenge grants
Focal species: Starlings (Sturnidae sp.)
Conservation status: Least concern
Disciplines: Physiology, ornithology
Research location: United Kingdom
Project summary
Juveniles of passerine species such as the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) experience massive mortality, much of which is caused by direct or indirect effects of nutritional stress. Of birds that survive, many will bear the “scars” of early-life stress that have consequences for their welfare. The aim of this project is to identify the metabolic “fingerprint” of nutritional stress in starling nestlings and to validate sensitive and non-invasive molecular biomarkers that can be used to assess the welfare of wild starlings.
This group has been developing the hypothesis that biomarkers of biological age not only predict future morbidity and mortality, but also reflect the quality of an animal’s cumulative lifetime experience. Existing metrics of biological age, particularly telomere length, require invasive blood samples, and measurements are imprecise, meaning that large sample sizes are currently required to obtain significant effects in epidemiological studies. Estimating biological age based on measuring multiple age-related biomarkers (as is typical in the human aging literature) is likely to be more reliable than using telomere length alone.
This project will use untargeted metabolomics to identify multiple novel biomarkers of exposure to nutritional stress in nestling starlings. This “fingerprint” will be validated by testing whether it predicts gold-standard behavioral measures of adult affective experience in a cohort of laboratory-raised birds. Metabolomics measures thousands of small molecules in one biological sample and can be performed on a range of tissues including blood, hair, and urine. The aim will be to identify an applicable panel of metabolites that can be measured cheaply and easily from feathers and the uric acid component of guano.
Why we funded this project
This project should introduce a novel indicator of long-term welfare that is less invasive, requires fewer resources, and is potentially more reliable than similar existing methods. The PI is a world leader in the field of animal behavior and is the main originator of using biological aging to understand long-term animal welfare, especially in non-model species. For that reason, we are especially confident in this work being high-quality and having great academic reach and influence.
Photos
